DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Benchmarks, Capabilities, and Architecture

Learn DeepSeek V4.1 Flash’s benchmarks and architecture changes, including 1M context and KV cache compression, to plan agent tests.

On this page

DeepSeek replaced its flagship with a smaller model. On September 10, 2026, it released DeepSeek V4.1 Flash as deepseek-flash and will route deepseek-v4-pro traffic to it from 04:00 UTC on September 14.

The new model costs less, keeps a 1M context, and leads V4 Pro on most agent benchmarks DeepSeek reports. Gains come from a Causal Encoder-Decoder backbone and deep KV cache compression. Treat it as a new base model and re-test V4 workflows.

What shipped

  • Launch: September 10, 2026. API name deepseek-flash. MIT weights at deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash.
  • Retired: deepseek-v4-flash and deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp are retired. Both aliases now serve V4.1 Flash at Flash prices.
  • Routing: From 04:00 UTC September 14, all deepseek-v4-pro calls serve V4.1 Flash at Flash rates until V4.1 Pro ships.
  • Family: DeepSeek calls V4.1 Flash the smallest model in its new architecture family. V4.1 Pro has no published card or date.

The .1 label reads like a patch. The weights are a fresh 552B pretrain.

Architecture: what changed from V4

V4 Flash was a 284B MoE with 13B active per token. V4.1 Flash keeps 1M context and 384K max output and changes how context is processed.

Detail V4 Flash (0731) V4.1 Flash
Base 284B MoE, 13B active 552B MoE, 8B prefill / 16B decode
Extra memory - 196B Engram conditional memory, sparse
Layers Standard Transformer 40-layer CED: 20 encoder + 20 decoder
Experts - 1 shared + 384 routed, 6 active per token
Vision Separate Vision-Exp Native DeepSeek-ViT
KV cache Baseline 890 bytes per token, FP4 E2M1
Persistent cache Baseline ~1/8 of V4 Flash via SWA Bounded Replay

Four mechanisms:

  • CED. Decoder global KV is projected from encoder final states. Prefill uses 8B. Decode uses 16B. This favors input-heavy traces.
  • CSA2. Layers use Full, Reindex, or Reuse modes. KV and indexer state is shared. Hierarchical indexer limits deeper layers to a candidate pool.
  • FP4 cache. E2M1 FP4 with one E4M3 scale per 16 channels. DeepSeek reports ~1/4 HBM of V4 Flash and ~1/437 of V1.
  • SWA Bounded Replay. Missing sliding-window KV is rebuilt from the last window. Persistent storage drops to ~1/8.

Other pieces include Single-Pass mHC, Engram, and DSpark decoding. Pretrained on 45T tokens, sparse attention at 64K extended to 1M at 34T. Recipe is SFT, RL, and on-policy distillation.

Pricing and API

Prices per 1M tokens. Off-peak is half of peak.

Meter (per 1M) Off-peak Peak
Input cache hit $0.003 $0.006
Input cache miss $0.15 $0.30
Output $0.60 $1.20
Context 1M 1M
Max output 384K 384K
Concurrency 2,500 2,500

Peak: 01:00-04:00 and 06:00-10:00 UTC Mon-Fri. V4 Pro lists $0.022/$0.044 hit, $0.66/$1.32 miss, $1.98/$3.96 output. V4 Flash 0731 listed $0.007/$0.014, $0.22/$0.44, $0.66/$1.32.

A 1M miss plus 1M output job is $0.75 off-peak or $1.50 peak by rate card. Measured cost also varies with reasoning length, retries, and hit rate.

API:

  • Bases https://api.deepseek.com and https://api.deepseek.com/anthropic
  • Text plus image input, text output. JSON and function calling supported
  • Thinking on by default. Continuous reasoning_effort 1 to 100. Published scores use 100
  • Responses API native. Partners WorkBuddy/CodeBuddy and OpenCode listed day one

Benchmarks

All scores are vendor-reported at max reasoning effort. Use them to plan tests.

Benchmark V4 Flash V4 Pro V4.1 Flash Reference
Terminal-Bench 2.1 82.7 87.9 90.6 89.1 Opus 5.0, 88.8 GPT-5.6 Sol
DeepSWE v1.1 54.4 62.7 74.2 74.0 Opus 5.0, 73.0 Sol
CyberGym 76.7 83.3 88.1 84.5 Sol
AutomationBench 37.7 43.2 54.8 50.3 Opus 5.0
HLE with tools 51.5 60.0 63.9 63.6 Opus 5.0
GPQA Diamond 89.9 92.4 90.9 94.1 Sol, 93.4 Opus 5.0
HLE no tools 37.8 42.7 36.8 (39.1 text) 56.3 Opus 5.0, 44.5 Sol
Terminal-Bench 3.0 7.6 11.8 30.0 43.3 Opus 5.0
Terminal-Bench 4.0 7.0 12.4 31.2 51.8 Opus 5.0
Codeforces 3289 3348 3471 -
SEC-Bench Pro 30.9 56.4 62.8 74.3 Sol

Takeaways:

  • Agent coding leads. DeepSWE, Terminal-Bench 2.1, CyberGym, AutomationBench all rise. DeepSWE 74.2 matches Opus 5.0 in that setup.
  • Reasoning mixed. GPQA sits between V4 Flash and V4 Pro. HLE without tools stays below frontier.
  • Scaffold matters. DeepSWE 74.2 on mini-SWE is 72.6 on DeepSeek Harness Minimal and 65.6 on Codex. Terminal-Bench 2.1 is 90.6 Minimal, 90.3 mini-SWE, 84.1 Codex.

Base notes: MMLU-Pro 74.1 vs 73.5 V4 Pro vs 68.3 V4 Flash. HumanEval 79.4 vs 76.8 vs 69.5. Multimodal: 56.5 MMMU-Pro, 77.9 CVBench, 95.6 DocVQA, 86.0 RefCOCO. Artificial Analysis reports 190 tokens per second and Index 40 at max effort.

Capabilities

  • Long context. 1M at 890 bytes per token is ~0.9 GB global KV for a full window. Helps repeated prompts and large repo traces.
  • Native vision. One endpoint for text and images. No separate Vision-Exp model needed.
  • Effort dial. 1 to 100 controls reasoning cost. Track output tokens with latency.
  • Concurrency. 2,500 matches V4 Flash and tops V4 Pro at 500. Routed Pro traffic gets the higher limit.

Limits:

  • Trails Opus 5.0 and Sol on Terminal-Bench 3.0 and 4.0.
  • Bills by clock. Weekday peak windows cost double.
  • New backbone changes behavior. Tuned prompts and tool schemas may need updates.

What to test before September 14

If deepseek-v4-pro is hard-coded, behavior changes without a deploy.

  • Run identical workflows on deepseek-flash and deepseek-v4-pro now. Log versions.
  • Keep context, tools, approvals, and success criteria fixed. Change only the model.
  • Measure completion vs product state, retries and failures, hit vs miss ratio and output tokens, wall-clock time, reviewer edits.
  • Include failure cases: incomplete data, denied access, ambiguous match, duplicate request, already completed action.
  • Compare consolidated vision path against split model path for image work.

Use rate card for estimates and billing logs for totals. Savings quotes assume equal token counts. Totals change when token counts change.

Where Ginger Labs fits

At Ginger Labs, we provide an embedded agent that lives inside a SaaS product and works with its schemas, records, and permissions. It handles retrieval, tool execution, evaluations, and observability.

The product keeps authority. The model proposes a call and the product authorizes it, validates payload, and applies approval policy. V4.1 Flash can sit behind that boundary as V4 Flash or V4 Pro.

Teams keep their data model, domain rules, tenant scope, and definition of done. We supply the agent surface that makes cross-version checks measurable. Useful for a short pilot that compares September 14 behavior before it becomes default.

Sources

Material unknowns: No large independent benchmark yet. Production cache hit rates are unpublished. V4.1 Pro scale, price, and date are still unannounced.

About the author

RT

RocketAEO Team

Machine Learning Researcher·Ginger Labs

RocketAEO Team writes about production LLM infrastructure at Ginger Labs.